Home

Secure Future In the News | "Candidates - Meet the People!" Feb. 14th at 1:30 | Bite the Ballot | Join the Team - Contact Us | Message on the Ballot | Referendum Primer | The Story of the People's Referendum, Feb 25th
Chicago's Anit-War Resolution
This time - you will be counted!
This resolution answers the key political and historical question: Is War the Only Answer? It also identifies the price we pay: insecurity and economic decline. These Alderman submitted this resolution to the City Council on Dec. 4, 2002. Hearings are scheduled for January.

Alderman Madeline L. Haithcock, 2nd Ward
Alderman Dorothy J. Tillman, 3rd Ward
Alderman Toni Preckwinkle, 4th Ward
Alderman Leslie Hairston, 5th Ward
Alderman Freddrenna Lyle, 6th Ward
Alderman Todd H. Stroger, 8th Ward
Alderman Anthony Beale, 9th Ward
Alderman John Pope, 10th Ward
Alderman Ray Frias, 12th Ward
Alderman Theodore Thomas, 15th Ward
Alderman Arenda Troutman, 20th Ward
Alderman Reverend Dr. Leonard DeVille, 21st Ward
Alderman Ricardo Munoz, 22nd Ward
Alderman Michael R. Zalewski, 23rd Ward
Alderman Michael D. Chandler, 24th Ward
Alderman Billy Ocasio, 26th Ward
Alderman Ed H. Smith, 28th Ward
Alderman Isaac Carothers, 29th Ward
Alderman Emma Mitts, 37th Ward
Alderman Helen Shiller, 46th Ward
Alderman Joe Moore, 49th Ward

Is YOUR alderman listed? Congratulate him or her for taking a stand. Ask your alderman to support the resolution if he or she hasn't. Make sure that you include your address. This adds more weight to the message.

Patrick Elliott, one of our team, called and got Ald. Schulter to sign on!

Unknown Gem Type: tlx.tlx.forms

These Alderman have not signed onto the resolution.

Alderman Jesse D. Granato , 1st Ward
Alderman William M. Beavers, 7th Ward (promised to co-sign the resolution)
Alderman James A. Balcer, 11th Ward
Alderman Frank J. Olivo, 13th Ward
Alderman Edward M. Burke, 14th Ward
Alderman Shirley A. Coleman, 16th Ward
Alderman Latasha Thomas, 17th Ward
Alderman Thomas W. Murphy, 18th Ward
Alderman Virginia A. Rugai, 19th Ward
Alderman Daniel S. Solis, 25th Ward
Alderman Walter Burnett, Jr., 27th Ward
Alderman Michael A. Wojcik, 30th Ward
Alderman Ray Suarez, 31st Ward
Alderman Theodore Matlak, 32nd Ward
Alderman Richard F. Mell, 33rd Ward
Alderman Carrie M. Austin, 34th Ward
Alderman Vilma Colom, 35th Ward (promised to co-sign the resolution)
Alderman William J.P. Banks, 36th Ward
Alderman Thomas R. Allen, 38th Ward
Alderman Margaret Laurino, 39th Ward
Alderman Patrick J. O'Connor, 40th Ward
Alderman Brian G. Doherty, 41th Ward
Alderman Burton F. Natarus, 42th Ward
Alderman Vi Daley, 43rd, Ward (promised to co-sign the resolution)
Alderman Bernard J. Hnsen, 44th Ward
Alderman Patrick J. Levar, 45th Ward
Alderman Gene Schulter, 47th Ward (On Dec. 12th, he promised one of our callers to co-sign the resolution.)
Alderman Mary Ann Smith, 48th, Ward
Alderman Bernard L. Stone, 50th Ward

RESOLUTION OPPOSING A PRE-EMPTIVE
U.S. MILITARY ATTACK ON IRAQ

WHEREAS, the issues between Iraq and the world community have not proven to be irresoluble by traditional diplomatic efforts; and
WHEREAS, no evidence has been presented that Iraq poses an imminent threat to the security of the United States or the safety of its citizens; and
WHEREAS, hastily implemented unilateral U.S. military actions would risk the deaths of thousands of Iraqi civilians without guaranteeing the safety and security of U.S. citizens, nor would such unilateral actions guarantee the installation of a free and democratic Iraqi government; and
WHEREAS, a pre-emptive U.S. military attack would violate international law and our commitments under the U.N. Charter and further isolate the U.S. from the rest of the world; and
WHEREAS, a U.S.-led war in Iraq would purloin billions of dollars from the U.S. economy, compromise our current action in Afghanistan, and require years of nation-building activities in Iraq; and
WHEREAS, the Bush administration has failed to articulate a clear strategic objective or outcome of a military attack against Iraq, and such an attack fails to enjoy the support of many of our important allies;

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that we, the members of the City Council of the City of Chicago, oppose a pre-emptive U.S. military attack on Iraq unless it is demonstrated that Iraq poses a real and imminent threat to the security and safety of the United States; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we support a return of U.N. weapons inspectors to Iraq, enhanced by sufficient police support to guarantee unfettered access to all targeted sites; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we urge the U.S. to work through the U.N. Security Council and reaffirm our nation's commitment to the rule of law in all international relationships; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Illinois congressional delegation and the President of the United States.

The Chicago Sun-Times took issue with Alderman Joe Moore for submitting this resolution. If anyone has an electronic copy I will post it here. Meanwhile, here's Ald. Moore's response, printed on Dec.10, 2002.

To the Editor:
I must take issue with your recent editorial criticizing the City Council resolution that opposes a preemptive U.S. military strike in Iraq ("A Premature Leap Into World Affairs," Dec. 4). While I certainly will not question your description (albeit tongue in cheek) of life in the 49th Ward, I do strongly challenge your claim that the resolution has no relevance to the city of Chicago.

According to the Congressional Budget Office a military adventure against Iraq will cost our nation between $9 and $13 billion a month. The American Academy of Arts and Sciences estimates the war and post-war occupation of Iraq could cost as much as $1.9 trillion over a 10-year period.

Just where does the Sun-Times think the money will come from? From an increase in taxes? Of course not. President Bush has reaffirmed his intention to make permanent his trillion-dollar tax cut plan.

No, the war will be financed by deficit spending and drastic cuts in domestic spending. In either case, my neighborhood and the city of Chicago will suffer the consequences of a sagging economy and even more cuts in federally funded projects and programs.

Just about every initiative that improves the quality of life of Chicago residents is supported at least in part by federal dollars-affordable housing, transportation, health care, childcare, education, public safety, and energy bill assistance for low-income families. The list goes on and on. These programs are already suffering reductions in funding, and will suffer even more dramatic cuts if our nation finances a war against Iraq.

And it is Chicago's sons and daughters who will be recruited, perhaps even conscripted, to fight that war.

Given the very dire consequences that waging an unprovoked war on Iraq would have on Chicago's neighborhoods, the members of the City Council are at least as qualified as newspaper editorial writers to weigh in on this important foreign affairs issue.

The 24 aldermen who now sponsor the City Council resolution certainly support our nation's right to defend itself when its security is at real risk. Our leaders in Washington have yet to make the case, however, that such an imminent danger exists. Where is the evidence that we are in more danger of an attack by Iraqi weapons of mass destruction than, say, North Korean weapons of mass destruction? Yet there is no talk of a preemptive strike against North Korea.

The arguments against a hasty rush into war are not those of college sophomores, as your editorial claims, but belong to well-known foreign policy "hawks," such as James Baker, Lawrence Eagleburger, Brent Scowcroft and General Norman Schwartzkopf. They all have cautioned against a hasty U.S. military exercise against Iraq and have urged the president to first pursue a policy of diplomacy and containment (a policy, by the way, that worked for forty years against a far more serious threat posed by the Soviet Union).

It is that same thoughtful and deliberate approach to the Iraqi crisis that my colleagues and I are advocating through our resolution.

Very truly yours,
Alderman Joe Moore
49th Ward



As of Monday, November 25, 2002, three alderman have agreed to submitt a resolution against a possible invasion. They are Joe Moore (49th), Toni Preckwinkle (4th), and Helen Schiller (47th). All alderman are being asked to sponsor, contribute, change and create their own resolution.

Below is a sample resolution created by members of the Chicagoans Against the War on Iraq.

WHEREAS the residents of the City of Chicago
and their local elected officials have the constitutional right to
petition the national government on this matter of
grave concern to our city, the nation, and the world
community, and

WHEREAS, the residents of the City of Chicago hold high
the sanctity of human life; and

WHEREAS, the residents of the City of Chicago believe
that a democratic nation should neither be an aggressor
nation nor pursue an unjust war; and

WHEREAS the people of the City of Chicago do not
believe it is the right of one nation to dictate the
choices of another nation, however heinous the leaders
it chooses; and

WHEREAS, former United Nations weapons inspectors,
other experts, and world leaders have testified that
Iraq - unlike North Korea, India, Pakistan, or Israel -
neither possesses nuclear weapons nor the capacity to
produce them, and does not pose an imminent threat to
the United States; and

WHEREAS, the actions of the Gulf War, the UN sanctions,
and continued bombing of regions of Iraq have already
resulted in the deaths of over 500,000 people,
predominantly Iraqi women, children, and the elderly,
yet have proven ineffective in accomplishing the
removal of Saddam Hussein; and

WHEREAS, a new attack on Iraq will cause tens or
hundreds of thousands more civilian casualties, as well
as military casualties on both sides of the conflict;
and

WHEREAS, The City of Chicago's 18-25 year old
population is likely to be a primary source of
conscription and recruitment for military personnel to
fight a war from which there is no just cause or
result; and

WHEREAS, the cost to the nation, including the City of
Chicago, is estimated to be more than 200 billion
dollars, thus depleting the reserves, harming the
economy, and resulting in further neglect of education,
health care, housing, and the infrastructure, as well
as other services desperately in need of repair or
reform; and

WHEREAS no one to date has been able to articulate why
war on Iraq is in the interest of American citizens;
and

WHEREAS, a war with Iraq has been declared by nearly
all U.S. religious leaders as unjust; and

WHEREAS, many national security experts, including the
Director of the CIA, state that an attack on Iraq is
more likely to result in the use of weapons of mass
destruction than will a policy of containment; and

WHEREAS, the leaders of most Middle Eastern and Muslim
nations warn that an attack on Iraq is likely to spur
even more animosity toward the U.S. from Muslims around
the world and fuel even more Islamic radicalism
directed against us; and

WHEREAS Osama Bin Laden and the al-Qaeda terrorist
network remain a serious threat to our nation that
demands security attention; and

WHEREAS, United Nations' led inspections have been far
more effective in eliminating weapons of mass
destruction than have been all the bombing during the
Gulf War; and

WHEREAS, a war with Iraq is unneeded, unjust, and poses
a real threat to our nation and our democratic
traditions and rights;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GOVERNING BODY OF
THE CITY OF CHICAGO hereby voices our opposition to any
preemptive strike or act of war contemplated by the
President and the Congress of the United States, and
resolves that no war against Iraq be undertaken at any
time by the United States unless as a response to a
direct military attack by Iraq.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the governing body
reaffirms The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and
the principles of international law, and calls on the
Bush administration and our representatives in Congress
to provide leadership in encouraging peace, democracy,
and respect for human rights in Iraq and throughout the
Middle East.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __day of ______, 2002