 |
This resolution answers the key political and historical question: Is War the Only Answer? It also identifies the price we pay: insecurity and economic decline. These Alderman submitted this resolution to the City Council on Dec. 4, 2002. Hearings are scheduled for January.
Alderman Madeline L. Haithcock, 2nd Ward
Alderman Dorothy J. Tillman, 3rd Ward
Alderman Toni Preckwinkle, 4th Ward
Alderman Leslie Hairston, 5th Ward
Alderman Freddrenna Lyle, 6th Ward
Alderman Todd H. Stroger, 8th Ward
Alderman Anthony Beale, 9th Ward
Alderman John Pope, 10th Ward
Alderman Ray Frias, 12th Ward
Alderman Theodore Thomas, 15th Ward
Alderman Arenda Troutman, 20th Ward
Alderman Reverend Dr. Leonard DeVille, 21st Ward
Alderman Ricardo Munoz, 22nd Ward
Alderman Michael R. Zalewski, 23rd Ward
Alderman Michael D. Chandler, 24th Ward
Alderman Billy Ocasio, 26th Ward
Alderman Ed H. Smith, 28th Ward
Alderman Isaac Carothers, 29th Ward
Alderman Emma Mitts, 37th Ward
Alderman Helen Shiller, 46th Ward
Alderman Joe Moore, 49th Ward
Is YOUR alderman listed? Congratulate him or her for taking a stand. Ask your alderman to support the resolution if he or she hasn't. Make sure that you include your address. This adds more weight to the message.
Patrick Elliott, one of our team, called and got Ald. Schulter to sign on! Unknown Gem Type: tlx.tlx.forms These Alderman have not signed onto the resolution. Alderman Jesse D. Granato , 1st Ward
Alderman William M. Beavers, 7th Ward (promised to co-sign the resolution)
Alderman James A. Balcer, 11th Ward
Alderman Frank J. Olivo, 13th Ward
Alderman Edward M. Burke, 14th Ward
Alderman Shirley A. Coleman, 16th Ward
Alderman Latasha Thomas, 17th Ward
Alderman Thomas W. Murphy, 18th Ward
Alderman Virginia A. Rugai, 19th Ward
Alderman Daniel S. Solis, 25th Ward
Alderman Walter Burnett, Jr., 27th Ward
Alderman Michael A. Wojcik, 30th Ward
Alderman Ray Suarez, 31st Ward
Alderman Theodore Matlak, 32nd Ward
Alderman Richard F. Mell, 33rd Ward
Alderman Carrie M. Austin, 34th Ward
Alderman Vilma Colom, 35th Ward (promised to co-sign the resolution)
Alderman William J.P. Banks, 36th Ward
Alderman Thomas R. Allen, 38th Ward
Alderman Margaret Laurino, 39th Ward
Alderman Patrick J. O'Connor, 40th Ward
Alderman Brian G. Doherty, 41th Ward
Alderman Burton F. Natarus, 42th Ward
Alderman Vi Daley, 43rd, Ward (promised to co-sign the resolution)
Alderman Bernard J. Hnsen, 44th Ward
Alderman Patrick J. Levar, 45th Ward
Alderman Gene Schulter, 47th Ward (On Dec. 12th, he promised one of our callers to co-sign the resolution.)
Alderman Mary Ann Smith, 48th, Ward
Alderman Bernard L. Stone, 50th Ward |
 |
RESOLUTION OPPOSING A PRE-EMPTIVE
U.S. MILITARY ATTACK ON IRAQ
WHEREAS, the issues between Iraq and the world community have not proven to be irresoluble by traditional diplomatic efforts; and
WHEREAS, no evidence has been presented that Iraq poses an imminent threat to the security of the United States or the safety of its citizens; and
WHEREAS, hastily implemented unilateral U.S. military actions would risk the deaths of thousands of Iraqi civilians without guaranteeing the safety and security of U.S. citizens, nor would such unilateral actions guarantee the installation of a free and democratic Iraqi government; and
WHEREAS, a pre-emptive U.S. military attack would violate international law and our commitments under the U.N. Charter and further isolate the U.S. from the rest of the world; and
WHEREAS, a U.S.-led war in Iraq would purloin billions of dollars from the U.S. economy, compromise our current action in Afghanistan, and require years of nation-building activities in Iraq; and
WHEREAS, the Bush administration has failed to articulate a clear strategic objective or outcome of a military attack against Iraq, and such an attack fails to enjoy the support of many of our important allies;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that we, the members of the City Council of the City of Chicago, oppose a pre-emptive U.S. military attack on Iraq unless it is demonstrated that Iraq poses a real and imminent threat to the security and safety of the United States; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we support a return of U.N. weapons inspectors to Iraq, enhanced by sufficient police support to guarantee unfettered access to all targeted sites; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we urge the U.S. to work through the U.N. Security Council and reaffirm our nation's commitment to the rule of law in all international relationships; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Illinois congressional delegation and the President of the United States.
The Chicago Sun-Times took issue with Alderman Joe Moore for submitting this resolution. If anyone has an electronic copy I will post it here. Meanwhile, here's Ald. Moore's response, printed on Dec.10, 2002.
To the Editor:
I must take issue with your recent editorial criticizing the City Council resolution that opposes a preemptive U.S. military strike in Iraq ("A Premature Leap Into World Affairs," Dec. 4). While I certainly will not question your description (albeit tongue in cheek) of life in the 49th Ward, I do strongly challenge your claim that the resolution has no relevance to the city of Chicago.
According to the Congressional Budget Office a military adventure against Iraq will cost our nation between $9 and $13 billion a month. The American Academy of Arts and Sciences estimates the war and post-war occupation of Iraq could cost as much as $1.9 trillion over a 10-year period.
Just where does the Sun-Times think the money will come from? From an increase in taxes? Of course not. President Bush has reaffirmed his intention to make permanent his trillion-dollar tax cut plan.
No, the war will be financed by deficit spending and drastic cuts in domestic spending. In either case, my neighborhood and the city of Chicago will suffer the consequences of a sagging economy and even more cuts in federally funded projects and programs.
Just about every initiative that improves the quality of life of Chicago residents is supported at least in part by federal dollars-affordable housing, transportation, health care, childcare, education, public safety, and energy bill assistance for low-income families. The list goes on and on. These programs are already suffering reductions in funding, and will suffer even more dramatic cuts if our nation finances a war against Iraq.
And it is Chicago's sons and daughters who will be recruited, perhaps even conscripted, to fight that war.
Given the very dire consequences that waging an unprovoked war on Iraq would have on Chicago's neighborhoods, the members of the City Council are at least as qualified as newspaper editorial writers to weigh in on this important foreign affairs issue.
The 24 aldermen who now sponsor the City Council resolution certainly support our nation's right to defend itself when its security is at real risk. Our leaders in Washington have yet to make the case, however, that such an imminent danger exists. Where is the evidence that we are in more danger of an attack by Iraqi weapons of mass destruction than, say, North Korean weapons of mass destruction? Yet there is no talk of a preemptive strike against North Korea.
The arguments against a hasty rush into war are not those of college sophomores, as your editorial claims, but belong to well-known foreign policy "hawks," such as James Baker, Lawrence Eagleburger, Brent Scowcroft and General Norman Schwartzkopf. They all have cautioned against a hasty U.S. military exercise against Iraq and have urged the president to first pursue a policy of diplomacy and containment (a policy, by the way, that worked for forty years against a far more serious threat posed by the Soviet Union).
It is that same thoughtful and deliberate approach to the Iraqi crisis that my colleagues and I are advocating through our resolution.
Very truly yours,
Alderman Joe Moore
49th Ward
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|